ext_6150 ([identity profile] gehayi.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] erastes 2008-11-03 03:07 pm (UTC)

I'd go with an author's note at the back, stating that yes, the year was 1648 by the way people then reckoned time, but that this would confuse contemporary readers, so you stuck with the modern dating system.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting