A new start!
Jul. 16th, 2006 09:45 amAnd by that I mean that (as most of you will already know, so no need for further comment!) I've closed my
underlucius fandom journal and will now be here on a permanent basis.
It's scary.
Am writing a short story and my first completely (or so I thought) unlikeable, unredeemable character. However, I'm not as clever as I thought I was as when I read it out to my mother she said "oh - poor man, I feel really sorry for him." *headdesk*
However: Have a quandry. It's a character study. He's thinking the entire story and he sounds more intelligent than you'd give him credit for. Hmm. need to try and address that, but what I was wondering... Do untutored people sound like that in their own heads? Do you think in dialect? *ponders*
It's scary.
Am writing a short story and my first completely (or so I thought) unlikeable, unredeemable character. However, I'm not as clever as I thought I was as when I read it out to my mother she said "oh - poor man, I feel really sorry for him." *headdesk*
However: Have a quandry. It's a character study. He's thinking the entire story and he sounds more intelligent than you'd give him credit for. Hmm. need to try and address that, but what I was wondering... Do untutored people sound like that in their own heads? Do you think in dialect? *ponders*
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 10:32 am (UTC)However, there's this one thesis that's stuck in my head from the studying days: that the limits of your language are the limits of your world. Meaning that having sufficient language skills (vocabulary etc.) define the extent to which a person is able to define and explain and comprehend the phenomena around him. While I don't necessarily buy this 100%, I still think there's a lot of truth in it, too.
(I think I've heard this during my linguistics studies, and more particularly when we were discussing the importance of ensuring that everybody learns at least one language properly.)
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 11:15 am (UTC)Besides, I don't think it's so much the dialect that's the problem as the vocabulary. Illiterate people are going to generally have a vocabularly limited to words necessary to function in daily life. Even those with poor educations (I'm thinking of my stepdaughter here - she barely scraped through high school and never reads anything) have limited ability to describe things fully and tend to use three small words when I'd use one larger one.
I had a similar problem with David who, like your character, was not stupid but had no real formal education and I had to be continually looking out that I didn't use concepts or references he'd have no way of knowing. It's tough.
I stand by the idea that it would be easier for you to give the character some level of education and slip that fact into his backstory than to rewrite the entire piece to make him sound less articulate. Though you'd probably learn a lot as a writer from doing that. Good luck, either way!
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 12:39 pm (UTC)continues to stalk
Date: 2006-07-16 01:35 pm (UTC)It'd be great if you did a phone post, reading a snippet of one of your works.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 01:52 pm (UTC)Think, too, about the way that, say, Pratchett, shows character through speech and thought. Granny Weatherwax, for example. She's VERY smart. No one would question that. But at the same time, she's a woman who grew up and spent her life in the small town of Lancre. And that's reflected in her suspicion of foreigners and foreign ways, as well as her characteristic phrase, "I can't be having with this." That's not dialect, but it's definitely a back-country expression. And it says a lot about her.
See what I mean?
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 03:09 pm (UTC)But the thing is, I'm painting it from his own head, and it's not necessarily his thoughts.. it's more his perceptions of his world, which was completely skewed. But reader WILL think it's his thoughts, and hence the dilemma coz the piece is poetic and arty farty and he just wouldn't speak like that.
*shoots self*
Thanks!
Re: continues to stalk
Date: 2006-07-16 03:11 pm (UTC)I'll try and do one and read something from Standish perhaps. I've been meaning to upload some voice files to the website too.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 03:14 pm (UTC)Unless I did it third person... that might be better.
I should not be angsting this much over a 2K fic! (considering it's not even 1K yet!!)
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 03:19 pm (UTC)It's a little different, though, in writing. Because people generally read and write in a standardized version of their language. So if a character thinks and speaks in a dialect different than standard written whathaveyou, it's going to pop out at the reader, with varying results. Some people like it, others find it irritating.
You might consider decorating your character's speech with flourishes that indicate regional dialect, but not cluttering that character's speech with so much regional color that it distracts the reader from the story while s/he tries to figure out what's actually being said.
I'm wondering about this unlikeable, unredeemable character. Is it the MC? And if so, why are you making him unredeemable? Perhaps his coming off as more than meets the eye is his way of telling you there's more to the story.
Good luck with your piece!
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 03:19 pm (UTC)*kicks him*
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 03:22 pm (UTC)Thanks, sweetie!
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 03:24 pm (UTC)Well, he's not unredeemable, that was probably the wrong word, but he's an executioner and I wanted to make him thoroughly unlikeable - but am failing!
Thanks again, very helpful.
xxx
Re: continues to stalk
Date: 2006-07-16 03:25 pm (UTC)I assumed as much.
I look fwd to hearing your voice reading your brilliant words.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 03:31 pm (UTC)Anyway, I knows these aren't new digs, but welcome nonetheless. As much as I enjoyed your fandom thoughts, I'm looking forward to reading more about your RL pursuits.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 03:36 pm (UTC)grrrr
Real life? *wibbles* I'd better get me one of them!
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 03:41 pm (UTC)I need to get a real life, too. *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 03:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 03:44 pm (UTC)and yay for moving on! cause growth is good...especially in writing.
**hugs**
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 03:54 pm (UTC)Bah. It's annoying, I wanted it to be all poetic.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 03:57 pm (UTC)Thanks hun!
xxx
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 04:39 pm (UTC)Sometimes they were quite subtle.
Often they'd mask it, too, so they didn't show up as too-clever compared to the people they worked with.
But it didn't happen often.
You'd get this effect from them maybe once or twice a month, not every other sentance.
That's tricky mix for somebody who's used to being able to stretch out for a lovely triple barrel latinate word that does the job right out of the box.
And yeah, they were really making cross-cultural allowances when they talked to me, because I couldn't hide the triple-barrel stuff even when I worked really hard at using simple language. My best efforts still showed that I had an "academic" background, just because of the way I contruct thought. The ability to tease something apart and run hypotheses in a very "if this, then this" manner was foreign to the way they would try something out.
"Hey, I thought if I cranked it over this way, it might catch better," is really abstract.
They can be really poetic, but it's not in a flowery way. It's more like a great stark photograph. Or a gut punch, maybe.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-16 05:28 pm (UTC)I do think in dialect at times. I grew up in coastal New England, and that is my dominant dialect. However, time and my roving ways have completely erased my accent and added new regional dialects.
haven't checked f-list for a few days
Date: 2006-07-17 09:25 am (UTC)[FWIW I think in a mixture of languages, as I speak.]
Btw
Date: 2006-07-17 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 05:29 pm (UTC)thank you!
no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 05:31 pm (UTC)Re: haven't checked f-list for a few days
Date: 2006-07-17 05:36 pm (UTC)and about time you friended, missus!
xxx