Find and Replace
Jul. 10th, 2009 12:23 pmTwice in two days I’ve seen two different people say that they have to go through their entire manuscript and replace double quotes with single ones (or vice versa) manually.
why? why why why?
FIND AND REPLACE, people. Don’t be frightened of it. If you are methodical with it it’s a hugely handy tool. Here’s the instructions for replacing single quotes with double ones.
1. FIND ‘
2. REPLACE “
(make sure of course your manuscript is using straight quotes in the first place, if the publisher wants curly quotes they can do them, but you should be using straights for your word processing.
Of course, what will happen is that you will end up with all your apostrophes as double quotes, but this is easily fixed too.
3. FIND “s
4. REPLACE ‘s
5. FIND s”
4. REPLACE s’
and so on. Of course, you can run a swift spell check and it will easily change don”t to don’t etc
much much much quicker than doing it by hand, believe you me.
You can also use this technique to standardise the space after your full stop to two spaces rather than one. That can also be fiddly, but still MUCH faster and reliable than scouring 300 or more pages and getting eyestrain.
Happy to do it for you, of course, for a small fee!
-
-
-
-
no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 12:24 pm (UTC)Mind you, one space after full-stop is normal these days. Two was standard when things were done on tripewriters, because the spacing was so regular that one space often didn't show up. With proportional spacing, two looks too large, so personally I wouldn't bother with that unless a publisher/agent specified it particularly.
I use Find/Replace most of all for replacing paragraph marks - people use them to put space between paragraphs, and I use proper paragraph formatting to make more space between, so I usually do F/R to replace ¶ ¶ with just ¶. Then select all and format paragraphs to have 4 or 6 points after.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 01:08 pm (UTC)Which is why machines will never completely replace people, thank goodness!
no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 02:17 pm (UTC)It takes a little logic sometimes--your apostrophe example is a good one--and more than one pass through the document, but jeez. So much easier--and more accurate-- than looking.
Automation is our friend.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 03:49 pm (UTC)Without I dread to think what my mss's would be like...
no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 03:58 pm (UTC)The Chicago style guide now goes for one space, but most of the publishers I've encountered prefer it, so I tend to format that way, as they can easily remove them, and that's much easier than me unlearning the habits of 40 years. RPress changed it to one space, I noticed, but all the other pubs used two spaces.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 06:20 pm (UTC):))
Axxx
no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 08:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 02:20 am (UTC)But I must be a dinosaur, I've been using double spaces at end of mss sentences and never noticed when it got changed. I did notice it when a co-writer always uses singletons, but I haven't seen anything specific on it as a general style change.
*That* is the kind of stuff that makes me feel aged!!
no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 04:16 pm (UTC)Angie