"never to be published" O RLY?
Aug. 1st, 2008 11:10 amSo Beedle was "never going to be published," eh? Yanno, JK - I don't believe one word that comes out of your mouth.
In nicer news things that never get old:
- Receiving contributors copies. My copies of Cruise Lines arrived (about a year after I was expecting them, but - yay!) and my cheque-let from Amazon.
- Royalties! Got the first amount for Speak Its Name which is small but encouraging. I have made more in one month with this book than I have in a year with Chiaroscuro. It raises my opinion of ebooks, a little!
- Great Youtube clips
I can't embed this video as there's no code, but it popped up on my flist a few days ago and is unmissable. Shatner (who, I'd forgotten, is startlingly pretty) playing Alexander the Great before he became Captain Kirk. The video is disturbingly hot (although it shouldn't be...) and Shatner wins MAJOR FTW points from me for: 1. Riding Bucephalus at full gallop, 2. In a very short skirt (ouch) and 3. waving a great big sword at the same time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ODQCdKEKp0
In nicer news things that never get old:
- Receiving contributors copies. My copies of Cruise Lines arrived (about a year after I was expecting them, but - yay!) and my cheque-let from Amazon.
- Royalties! Got the first amount for Speak Its Name which is small but encouraging. I have made more in one month with this book than I have in a year with Chiaroscuro. It raises my opinion of ebooks, a little!
- Great Youtube clips
I can't embed this video as there's no code, but it popped up on my flist a few days ago and is unmissable. Shatner (who, I'd forgotten, is startlingly pretty) playing Alexander the Great before he became Captain Kirk. The video is disturbingly hot (although it shouldn't be...) and Shatner wins MAJOR FTW points from me for: 1. Riding Bucephalus at full gallop, 2. In a very short skirt (ouch) and 3. waving a great big sword at the same time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ODQCdKEKp0
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 11:36 am (UTC)And I agree with you about JK - call me a cynic, but this was an obvious next step, wasn't it?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 11:54 am (UTC)Congrats on the royalties.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:50 pm (UTC)Awww - give her a break - all the proceeds are going to charity, not to her. :-P I don't think she intended to publish it initially, but the money she's going to be able to raise for charity (to add to the 2 million pounds) was probably a huge factor in the decision.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 03:11 pm (UTC)I know it's going to charity, but she made SUCH a huge dealio that "it would never be published" and that it was just for the special people who were involved in the Potter books (and I bet they felt special too, until yesterday)
I just think that if she wants to give money to charity, then she should just give money to charity. Her money. Not her reader's money. She is the richest woman in showbusiness, after all - and that's saying something. It just smacks of attention seeking, more attention seeking, rather. I know that's not a popular view, but still.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 05:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 11:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 07:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 07:40 am (UTC)Oh yes, obvious next step. I'm just disgusted that she used the whole "it will never be published" thing as the fulcrum to her ego trip when she announced the books last year and now....
I'm happy it's for charidee, but as she's the richest woman in showbusiness and richer than the queen, it wouldn't kill her to give some money to charity. Rather than 10percent of her book, (or whatever she gets, probably more, as its her) and get the readers to fork out more than actually she is! I wonder what "all proceeds" mean. That's such a vague term. Is it all royalties? or all profits?
Oh and look - released in time for Christmas!
(also cynical)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 07:40 am (UTC)