http://www.bbc.co.uk/merlin/
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Merlin
Well. It's not quite as bad as Robin Hood - being a little better acted for a start but it's not that far off. You really have to suspend any knowledge of ANY Arthur myth, no matter who told it and start from scratch - pretend that you know nothing about the legends at all.
What concerns me is that kids will be watching this that will think that this IS the story, and their parents wouldn't know any better one way or the other.
T E White, Malory, Monmouth and Tennyson are spinning - SPINNING - in their graves.
The Good:
* Merlin is a bit hot. So is Arthur. I see much slash in the future and perhaps fanfic. I'm sure this has been done deliberately by the writers. Merlin and Arthur hate each other and Merlin has been given the job of Arthur's manservant. They are the same age. *rolls eyes* No turning him into a minnow then, I'm guessing.
* The Cast: Richard Wilson, John Hurt, Anthony Head (camping it up beautifully)
* Special effects look promising and they've chucked a lot of money at it.
* Gwen from Torchwood dies twice! Hurrah!
The Bad:
* Makes the Sam Neill version (started well, got a bit floundering) look like The Definitive Version
* Guinevere is a serving wench and black. And no, saying that doesn't make me racist. But really - if she had even existed how bloody likely was it that she'd be black? What is this? Retroactive Scriptwriting? "OK Tarquin, we have a Muslim woman as a Merry Man, and a black Guinevere, do you think that'll make up for the Crusades and Slavery?"
* People throw perfectly good food at the Pillory.
* And they throw tomatoes. TOMATOES!!!
* When is this supposed to be set? It's a hideous mish mash of eras and - like many a Hollywood version seems to be "sort of" set sometime around the 12th? century? There's the knights dressed in plate armour and chain mail, someone saying that they can't find their glasses - metal hand rails set into stone castle staircases - and the architecture??? PLEASE don't get me started. Film in France apparently (and Wales) because obviously England doesn't have any castles.
I'm ashamed.
Anyone else see it?
ETA: There's a new BBC version of Tess of the D'urbevilles on now. Let's hope there's no computers and spaceships.
Page Summary
marquesate.livejournal.com - (no subject)
joyful-molly.livejournal.com - (no subject)
haydenthorne.livejournal.com - (no subject)
souliesoul.livejournal.com - (no subject)
alex-beecroft.livejournal.com - (no subject)
zamaxfield.livejournal.com - (no subject)
aunty_marion - (no subject)
volterra.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lareinenoire.livejournal.com - (no subject)
mzcalypso.livejournal.com - (no subject)
emilyveinglory.livejournal.com - (no subject)
suryaofvulcan.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 04:34 pm (UTC)There is a reason why I don't pay a TV license/haven't got a telly: what horror is that??? Why does the BBC do such awful things?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 04:36 pm (UTC):)
mildly OT
Date: 2008-09-21 07:26 pm (UTC)Phew, I'm not the only one after all ;). This description makes me go all DO NOT MISS! ;)
Re: mildly OT
Date: 2008-09-21 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 04:57 pm (UTC)Praying over your sword in overnight vigil and singing "I believe I can fly?"
no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 05:04 pm (UTC)As for Tess, I'm guessing that she escapes the gallows and runs off with Angel Clare for Geneva.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 05:52 pm (UTC)It's all well and good trying to aim for racial inclusion, but, I agree, Guinevere would most likely have been white.
I've pretty much given up on the BBC managing to get the concept of historical accuracy anywhere near their shows. They seem to think that they can handwave everything!
As for Tess, we had to study that in English and it was such a depressing read, really without hope, at least that's what's stayed with me, so I'm skipping that and typing up my art history notes instead!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 08:08 pm (UTC)Good edible anachronistic tomatoes too.
I didn't catch the name of the place, just some wibbling on about Albion. *rolls eyes* I may have to get the Sam Neill version out of DVD just to bleach my brain. Or The Disney Sword in the Stone. It says something when Disney is better than the BBC.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 08:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 07:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 08:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 10:57 pm (UTC)I have a region free DVD player and I'm not afraid to use it. ;-) A lot of other things, I'm afraid, I can't download because things that are compatible with PCs aren't always compatible with Macs.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 09:00 am (UTC)*makes face*
no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 08:12 pm (UTC)But the chain mail was very nicely knitted - I'm sure I couldn't have done better myself! Oh, and the nice modern English notices on the castle walls, in nice modern typography too. And Morgana's not-quite-there dress. And they appear to have nicked the dragon wholesale from Dragonheart - it was quite a shock that it sounded like Ollivander instead of Sean Connery!
Yes, the Merlin/Arthur slash is probably already being written. Though Arthur reminded me irresistably of Robert Addie as Guy of Gisburne in Robin of Sherwood - now that Merlin is his manservant, can we expect Arthur to take a bath, so he can ask Merlin to rub him dry? "Harder,
GisburneMerlin! Harder!"At least it's marginally better than Bon
ekickers.Ooops, reposted to fix wonky HTML!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 08:16 pm (UTC)"We expect great things from you, Mr Merlin, very great things."
Bonekickers? What was that? I had some very expensive psychiatry to rid my memory of that show, you know.
I do hope there's a bath in the near future.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 09:19 pm (UTC)Mallory, et al wrote for their generation and their generation's sensibilities -- and so chivalry played a major part in the Arthurian romances and the idea of courtly love. These things didn't exist in the dark ages.
This is just the 21st century's generation's take on it.
And given that I can't abide anything Arthurian that isn't properly set in the Dark Ages (well as properly as can be given what we know), I'll be avoiding this -- but um, Anthony Stewart Head is tempting.
Well, you know unless Clive Owen is in it -- in which I go batshit crazy that they got the history all wrong but drool over the boys and the stories. Ahem.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 09:21 pm (UTC):)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 02:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-21 11:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 08:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 01:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 08:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 08:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 04:12 pm (UTC)They are two old zine style novellas called 'Alas, the Red Dragin' and 'Among new Men'.
Really just reflecting my mlove of older men, in this case a *lot* older... oh well...
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 06:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 08:47 am (UTC):)