Take a Survey
Feb. 12th, 2009 10:29 amAnd silence the Christians. (gacked from valarltd)
http://www.silencingchristians.com/
Pause the video. Believe ME you really don't want to watch it. It's vile.
Go and tell them what you think on their survey - do homosexuals deserve: "special rights just like African Americans and other minorities!"?
I have to say, that in line with fairness, I don't believe that courts should be forced to elect judges who are more sympathetic to gays, and that employers should be FORCED to employ gays - so I said no to those, but I disagree that they should be discriminating against employing a person because he is gay which is a different matter entirely--ain't it great how concepts can be skewed. not.
When I was at Steeles a questionnaire came around asking us for our sexual orientation - because they were supposed to show that they were employing "a certain number of homosexuals" or something like that - and I told them to mind their own bloody business.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 10:35 am (UTC)OMG. JUST. NO.
I WOULD HAVE WRITTEN FRUITARIAN. AND THEN LET THEM PUZZLE THAT OUT.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 10:40 am (UTC)Political correctness gone mad!!
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 11:01 am (UTC)Morons.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 11:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:05 pm (UTC)@ssholes.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 11:28 am (UTC)I watched half of the video and was amused by the fact that I supported the dreaded 'gay agenda' even when summarized by this particularly biased source. Gays in the military? Oh the horrors!
Is it wrong to say at this point how glad I am to be British?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 11:29 am (UTC)"Erastes: Like Phelps, but completely opposite."
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 12:20 pm (UTC)Only about as wrong as it would be for me to be glad I'm Canadian. ^___^
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 12:19 pm (UTC)These people are fucking nuts.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:48 pm (UTC)I found it helpful to purge it in a work of novel-length fiction, which I then published. :-D
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:53 pm (UTC)Yes, it took 20+ years for me to escape and a week ago I had to sever contact with my parents (yet again) because my father started in with the Scriptures and the End Times thing - again. (The same scripture he used to justify his and my mother's horrendous physical and emotional abuse of me and my sister when we were kids.)
Ugh. Fundies.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:54 pm (UTC)What worries me most is the fundies in the military.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 01:12 pm (UTC)BTW that chick in the cerise jacket pings my gaydar.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 04:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 05:10 pm (UTC)I know - it's appalling! I know that it's meant in a good way, but it's too far in the wrong direction!!!
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:11 pm (UTC)I'm on the HRC mailing list, and something wonderful happened yesterday. Around noontime, HRC sent out an action call to email a TV station that had agreed to air this hour-long hate screech.
I was offline for a few hours. When I saw that email -- around 5 pm -- and clicked on the link to take action, the campaign had already been closed because the TV station had said they didn't want to be in the middle of someone else's fight and decided not to give the haters a site.
This BS will probably be mass-distributed the same way a similar one (purporting to link Barack Obama to al-quaeda) was sent around at election time. These SOBs have the money to pull all kinds of crap.
The purpose this time is probably to incite the usual screech monkeys to make a big fuss in California over the court battle against Prop Hate.
By all means, let's spam their survey -- but the last time this gang did something similar and the results weren't what they wanted, they simply took it down.
Which is a victory of sorts...
Thanks for the post!
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:45 pm (UTC)::snuzzles the goggy:: ^___^
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 03:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 05:14 pm (UTC)I love kitties, too. All animals, really, unless they are actively engaged in trying to eat me. :)
(Trufax: polar bears sometimes come down on the ice floes in the early spring - the reason why we DON'T walk on the beaches in March and April!)
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 05:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 07:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 08:13 pm (UTC)Every state that has offered a "Marriage Protection Amendment" has passed it with 70% or better of the population voting for it, with one exception. (and when they reworded it so unmarried straights could keep their rights, it went through) Mississippi passed one with 89%.
And they wonder why gays flee Christianity like it's a house afire.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-12 11:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-14 10:01 am (UTC)Well, I am a Christian, and I disagree with them. I think they have failed to understand the Gospel, have a limited concept of what it is and its relevance and function, that they have a narrow and unthinking approach to the Bible and that they are focusing on an issue that hardly even gets a mention in the Bible to the exclusion of pressing ones that do.
I really hate the way that these people make it hard for me to speak about my beliefs because I get lumped in with them even though I have almost nothing in common with them apart from a label and a book.
I agree about the political correctness issue sometimes going too far - I'm all for free speech, and perhaps more importantly free discussion. That does cut both ways. I think the most sane thing in your post is the comment 'mind their own bloody business' - that applies to both the extremes of political correctness. I hate those bits on surveys - the religion bit annoys me because people think they know what I believe if I tick 'Christian' and lump me in with the fundamentalists when I probably have more in common spiritually with a Zen Buddhist than with them (and that makes more a Christian in my own understanding, not less). The race bit annoys me because like I am, like everyone else in the UK, actually a mongrel with a mix of heritage and the colour of my skin means very little. The sexual orientation bit annoys me because I am open minded and don't want to label myself as one thing sexually just because I have never explored another.
In short- it all annoys me. 'Silencing Christians' annoys me. Political correctness annoys me. The insidious power and effect of simplistic labels annoys me.
Gah!