By that, I mean the reading of other people’s work. I’m so buoyed up with what’s happening in the historical fiction world right this minute that I can hardly speak, and utterly utterly privileged to be “behind the scenes” to see it happening.
Right now, I’m reading “Rainbow Plantation” by Robert Sheeley. I don’t know Robert from a bar of soap, so he hasn’t gained “minion” status! It’s a good story (so far) of white slave owner and black slave and so far isn’t as clichéd as that set up would hint at. It’s not perfectly written and the editing is a bit rough but it is self-published. However I am enjoying it – the main character is nicely conflicted, and not in the way you’d imagine.. It’s a shame it’s self published, and I hope that one of the small publishers – perhaps one of the People Of Colour (isn’t that a horrible phrase?) ones might pick it up.
Also I’ve just had the pleasure of reading chapter one of Joanne Soper-Cooke’s newest Devlin mystery. It’s stunning. I just told her that if she maintains that standard it will sell by the bucketload, and any publisher would be daft not to bite her arm off for it.
Then I’ve got a friend writing a regency ghost m/m story, and I know, with her meticulous research it will be GREAT, Chris Smith is editing her 15th century Florentine “Bonfire of the Vanities” era one, which is going to be good history as well as a good story, not to mention Lee’s Tangled Web and Don’s Lover’s Knot coming out in the Autumn with Running Press!! And there’s other stuff I can’t even TALK about yet. ARGH! So much goodness!
Talking of Joanne Soper-Cooke – she’s done a brilliant, and very funny post on The Macaronis about how her character tend to possess her and live with her every minute of the day. In this post, she takes her 1930s taxi-dancer character, George, shopping, which is just hilarious, so don’t miss it.
In other news, I’m also reading Little Dorrit. Quite the dullest Dickens I’ve read to date. I’d like to hope Little Dorrit dies of something really painful, but I know that she doesn’t. Damn it. What possessed Dickens to think that anyone would like the horrid milk-sop? *stabs her*
no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 08:18 pm (UTC)Which is why I suspect E put this in there - always whipping me into editing, the tartlet!
no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 08:26 pm (UTC)I'm simply curious, since I'm a Renaissance... how to say that in English without sounding like a moron... nut? fan? afficionado? Something like that.
Editing is satan. Sadly, one can't go without.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 08:31 pm (UTC)I don't really know how to describe the book, to be honest, as it is pretty malleable at the moment. It is set in Florence in the 15th Century, and pivots around the strange interlacings and seperations between the church and the state. It focuses, through the medium of several characters which are pure invention and a couple of real people who I'm horribly afraid I've completely mucked up, on that cusp in time just before the Bonfire of the Vanities, when Savonarola was just pulling himself into that position of ultimate power, enough power to challenge the Medici.
Oh I'm essentially rewriting it longhand. Which means it takes me about 15-20mins per page. There are 455 pages. Feel free to do the math. It should pick up in a while, the beginning is pretty awful, but it does improve a bit when I realised what I actually wanted to write.
Now I'm curious - what language would you prefer to say you're a renaissance aficionado in?
no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 08:46 pm (UTC)Rewriting longhand? Wow! That is beautiful. Lots of work, but beautiful.
What language? Oh, German.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 09:26 pm (UTC)If there is any way I can get it to seem as good as your description, I shall count it a job well done. Scary responsibility.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 02:31 am (UTC)*is deeply impressed*
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 03:07 am (UTC)Oh that's right, feed the monster! :-D
Seriously, as I said in email, I am horribly pleased that you like it. I know you have high standards and I want very much to at least try to come up to them. I really appreciate that you read my stuff - I mean that. It means a lot to me. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 04:43 am (UTC)"No, I am not doing *that*, cut it out, I do not have the reflexes to pull that one off!" I hear myself saying over and over.
Sigh.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-22 09:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-22 09:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-22 09:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-24 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-25 09:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-25 09:04 am (UTC)I have the best flist.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-25 09:06 am (UTC)