zombie anthology going ahead:
Feb. 14th, 2010 08:45 amFrom Jim Hines’ LJ – a further statement from the editor of the anthology:
My comment to him was I found it hard to understand why this problem had even arisen. He said that he was concerned that by having straight writers in the anthology, the GLBTQ population would be represented in a “bad light” - but why would that be? Why would he choose stories that did do this to go into the anthology? Weird.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 08:46 am (UTC)Am up. Am going to wash hair. Will edit until about 1pm. Then make lasagne and clean kitchen. I am telling you think SO I STICK TO THE PLAN.
Mwah?
no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 02:54 pm (UTC)If that's the publisher's idea of spelling and punctuation...
no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 10:41 pm (UTC)He doesn't seem to understand what an editor IS or DOES.
Um, the slanderous stories by evil straights will jump in
there all by themselves? How, pray tell?
A cluster-fuck, IMO.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-14 10:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-15 04:07 pm (UTC)It was painful even to read that excerpt.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-16 06:12 pm (UTC)http://www.leewind.org/
Here it's saying other authors from the same publishing house were the ones complaining. Huh?
no subject
Date: 2010-02-16 06:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-16 10:10 pm (UTC)Ugh. Either way, it's pretty much crap. I can't believe any author would get upset about other authors or anthologies containing any content or contributor, really.