review, standish, deathly hollows
Feb. 1st, 2007 11:49 pmAnother lovely website review!
I find it interesting that there's a release date when she was still no-where near finished on 19th December. So we'll end up with the same ghost writer as before then. Yes, I firmly believe that part of HBP was written by committee. To me, that's the only reason for such drastic disregard for canon and changes in characterisation.
I have no good preconceptions about this book. Don't get annoyed with me. If people are entitled to be all squeeful about the anticipation, I'm allowed to be mildly blah about it. The strange thing is that this will be the first HP Book that I will not be reading with happiness. HBP destroyed that. This one, I warn you now, will be read for spork value only from day one. I don't think it will be good, I don't think the plotholes that she's created will be addressed and there will be so many cliches that I shall despair.
I've just read (and yes, it's been up for ages but I hadn't seen it) that she answered a question regarding secret keepers on her website. Basically the gist of it was this: That when a secret keeper dies (Dumbledore being the only one we know who's died) the secret dies with them. MEANING that Grimmauld Place will remain secret. Anyone that DD had given the secret to would know the secret, but they would not be able to pass the secret on. Anyone not the secret keeper might know the secret - eg a lot of people know the secret of Grimmauld Place. But they cannot divulge it - only the SK can. And once they die - no-one new can ever know it.
Problems:
1. How then, did Dumbledore, Minerva, Hagrid know where Godrics Hollow was? Peter wouldn't have told them.
2. by JKR's own logic, Bella knew where Grimmauld Place was before the spell but she lost track of it afterwards?
3. Why was Moody so worried that anyone would follow them to Grimmauld Place?
It hurts my brain.
I find it interesting that there's a release date when she was still no-where near finished on 19th December. So we'll end up with the same ghost writer as before then. Yes, I firmly believe that part of HBP was written by committee. To me, that's the only reason for such drastic disregard for canon and changes in characterisation.
I have no good preconceptions about this book. Don't get annoyed with me. If people are entitled to be all squeeful about the anticipation, I'm allowed to be mildly blah about it. The strange thing is that this will be the first HP Book that I will not be reading with happiness. HBP destroyed that. This one, I warn you now, will be read for spork value only from day one. I don't think it will be good, I don't think the plotholes that she's created will be addressed and there will be so many cliches that I shall despair.
I've just read (and yes, it's been up for ages but I hadn't seen it) that she answered a question regarding secret keepers on her website. Basically the gist of it was this: That when a secret keeper dies (Dumbledore being the only one we know who's died) the secret dies with them. MEANING that Grimmauld Place will remain secret. Anyone that DD had given the secret to would know the secret, but they would not be able to pass the secret on. Anyone not the secret keeper might know the secret - eg a lot of people know the secret of Grimmauld Place. But they cannot divulge it - only the SK can. And once they die - no-one new can ever know it.
Problems:
1. How then, did Dumbledore, Minerva, Hagrid know where Godrics Hollow was? Peter wouldn't have told them.
2. by JKR's own logic, Bella knew where Grimmauld Place was before the spell but she lost track of it afterwards?
3. Why was Moody so worried that anyone would follow them to Grimmauld Place?
It hurts my brain.
*headdesk*
Date: 2007-02-02 12:04 am (UTC)Re: *headdesk*
Date: 2007-02-02 12:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 12:14 am (UTC)*G* But yes, I agree. After Lucius got locked up and didn't escape even though less able men were able to - I sort of lost the will to live...
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 12:37 am (UTC)LusciousLucius got locked up? *emo tear*no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 07:36 pm (UTC)It'll be on line within hours.*G*
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 12:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 07:38 pm (UTC)*scarred for life*
Fandom won't die, obviously, but I think a lot of the more discerning people (not all,) have already found other toys to play with.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 12:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 06:54 pm (UTC)No, seriously. I targetted every single website review site I could find and I sent all those who requested a copy the final galley proof via pdf.
I don't know if the publisher has sent out any hard copies to anyone.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 07:12 am (UTC)Because I'm apparently too lazy to look it up myself. :D
It's my birthday ;-)
Date: 2007-02-02 07:29 am (UTC)which is also Hemingway's birthday
...
which is July 21st X-D
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 07:33 pm (UTC)And look - one of my NICE flist answered your question. I wouldn't have. I'd have spanked you. But you'd like that too much.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 11:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 07:01 pm (UTC)*G*
Yes, they are interesting, but so far the only thing I've learned is that different people find different things. e.g. one reviewer thought the sex was a "bit much" and another thought it was a bit bland!
This recent one from Reflection's Edge was interesting, the reviewer said that she would have liked more UST, as she thought that Ambrose and Rafe fell into bed a bit quick. I agree and I probably would have continued it, where I re-writing it, but it was just the way it happened then - Ambrose took over and became more fascinated by Rafe, and it was hard to continue to hate him once he met him and saw how much he loved his son. I'll have to wait for a less favourable reveiw before I can answer how that makes me feel.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 02:24 pm (UTC)And yeah... incontinuity sucks... They do boggle the minds.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 02:36 pm (UTC)I had a few thoughts on your questions, though:
1.) Well, okay. This one I don't. For my WIP, I've invented something called Irving's Invisible Until the Inevitable Ink. The writer writes whatever down, and the words don't appear until the writer is dead. Therefore, James wrote down the location for several people, and once he was dead, the words appeared. I got the impression that once the SK told someone the secret, that person could tell anyone else. No, that doesn't make sense, or DD wouldn't have had to write the note. Maybe once the subject of the secret dies, the secret is no longer secret any more?
2.) Maybe Bella knew where it was, but didn't realize the OotP was making headquarters there? This one hurts my head too.
3.) THIS one I can answer! Even if the DE's couldn't get into 12 GP, if they realized that the Order was set up in a specific neighborhood or part of town, it would be easy to ambush them. That one I'm okay with.
Plus, I can see Moody not trusting a Fidelius charm anyway. :)
But I agree- it hurts the brain.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 07:27 pm (UTC)My predictions are going up now.
Yes, I tend to agree with you about Bella, she obviously knew where the house was, but would probably have just forgotten once the spell hit. And then was unable to tell anyone. But argh. my head.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 07:49 pm (UTC)I know this was has been on the drawing board for some time but it feels a bit rushed too. Maybe you've got a point about the committee.