burned! party! help!
May. 21st, 2007 09:52 pmI'm still reeling from the burning of The Cutty Sark. I really feel like I've lost a friend. Always there, always beautiful. I'm in 2 minds as to whether she SHOULD be restored, when does restoration become reproduction? I still can't believe she's now a charred blackened lump.
*sniffs*
There's been an influx of new friends recently. When I was
underlucius I used to welcome each and every one and I've got out of the habit, but I'm going to start again.
Welcome!
biwriters,
hskinn,
latetocomics,
learningtoread, ~
msminpdx
finneganthepoet
ann_amalie,
bialogue,
darkseaglass,
gavinatlas,
geishawhite,
mylodon,
willshenillshe,
wolfbear
catherineldf,
djebrin,
galadhir,
girluknow,
jefffunk,
liz_dejesus,
logophilos,
moshi,
tigerblak,
vinnie_tesla
You can drink anything except the good absinthe. And the blond poledancer is mine. Thank you. Make yourselves at home.
moshi - I can SEE you, I think this is your fourth party. You could at least bring a present.
I really need a title for this Regency. You don't realise just how clever a title Sense & Sensibility is until you try and copy it. I came up with Male & Malleable, Reason & Reasonability, Arse & Asininity. *chokes * Not REALLY what I want... Any ideas guys? Basically its just a man back from the war who meets a snarky cripple with BIG chips on his shoulders. And the first person to say Chip and Dale will be eviserated with a Quizzing Glass.
FINALLY - Everyone with any interest in Queer Fiction needs to read
scottynola's thoughts
*sniffs*
There's been an influx of new friends recently. When I was
Welcome!
You can drink anything except the good absinthe. And the blond poledancer is mine. Thank you. Make yourselves at home.
I really need a title for this Regency. You don't realise just how clever a title Sense & Sensibility is until you try and copy it. I came up with Male & Malleable, Reason & Reasonability, Arse & Asininity. *chokes * Not REALLY what I want... Any ideas guys? Basically its just a man back from the war who meets a snarky cripple with BIG chips on his shoulders. And the first person to say Chip and Dale will be eviserated with a Quizzing Glass.
FINALLY - Everyone with any interest in Queer Fiction needs to read
no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 09:10 pm (UTC)Rectum & Recommended
I'm kidding, but you've got me started on teh fun. :D
no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 09:29 pm (UTC)Shame it's completely unusable! However I shall keep it in mind, perhaps it can be used for a Freudian piece later on?
Thank you!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 09:12 pm (UTC)Much the same as H.M.S. Victory - there's a company, The Victory Oak Collection, that makes lovely wooden items (but too expensive for me, mostly!) from wood and copper reclaimed when they've restored her. And a proportion of the profits goes back into keeping her sound. Their literature/info points out that repair/replacement of unsound parts was always an ongoing thing, and the amount of replacement that has to be done these days is pretty minimal in comparison. It'd be quite nice if they could do that for the Cutty Sark too, and I believe that has been mooted, from what I overheard at the Victory Oak stand at Hatfield a week ago.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 09:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 09:12 pm (UTC)So, War and Peace is right out, then.
Are you trying to do Thing & OtherThing as a title format?
Great character conflict premise, by the by.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 09:32 pm (UTC)Thank you!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 05:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 09:25 pm (UTC)'Hard and Fast'?
(please don't hit me, I am horrible with titles too!'
no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 09:28 pm (UTC)*G*
no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 10:24 pm (UTC)I bought many queer titles via ISO in the past. I can't wrap my mind around the loss of Planetout and their subsidiaries. *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 07:00 am (UTC)I can only try and stay optimistic that more mainstream publishers will take gay themed works as the smaller ones drop out -or new ones will spring up.
It sucks here though. We have no gay themed publisher in the UK.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 07:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 12:33 am (UTC)I have a boat thing, you see.
I read elsewhere that she'd been largely dismantled for renovation, so the decks are the worst damage. Pray it's so.
As far as reprodcution? The Constitution is only about 15 percent original timbers, she's been redone for so long. But a ship...is a ship. And as long as there some of her there, her spirit lives.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 07:03 am (UTC)I just hope the frame isn't too damaged.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 02:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 07:05 am (UTC)Welcome and no worries, it's just nice to see newbies comment.
xxx
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 07:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 07:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 10:58 am (UTC)um, and apologies for drinking all the red wine....
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 11:11 am (UTC)You are welcome to the red wine, *hic*
xxx
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 01:15 pm (UTC)I had a crack at the title but stuck fast. Much harder than it looks. Austen pinched Pride & Prejudice from Fanny Burney (much better than First Impressions, deeply feeble title) and I think S&S was a phrase in general usage at the time so I guess even she had to wrack her brains ...
The best I could do was Diffidence & Desire. Yawn.
Altho' it's been used before (by CM Yonge) I like Love & Self-Love. If we are to believe Mr Tyrold in Camilla lecturing the poxy Eugenia that a too great a sense of personal defects arises from vanity, it would seem apt ... and the smutty connotations wouldn't go amiss, either!
Very interested by Scottynola's analysis of the demographic for gay romance. I think he misses the mark about female readers wanting a mix of straight and gay characters, though. I always skip the straight parts in Maupin! Straight stories are so scripted they bog down under their own predictability ... and it's not like I can't read them everywhere else, all the damn time. It reminds me of the criticism feminists get if they "exclude" men by focusing on women's (trival) activities. Concentrating on the marginalized group is deemed an artistic failure because it refuses to depict the dominant majority, without which any picture is flawed and incomplete ... feh. So having been squeezed out of dominant discourse, we still have to admit THEM into our marginal world or be condemned as a fanatic.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 01:40 pm (UTC)I don't know. Ive never had so much trouble naming a book before... *fume* Perhaps its because my mother always came up with titles and she's gone! *wah*