Robin Hood. Could have been good, too.
Feb. 10th, 2011 10:02 amWatched Robin Hood last night. Underneath all the Hollywood clap trap and tropes there was probably a pretty decent film but gah!
I can't comment on the technology and stuff although I'm sure somebody already has but there was so much to boggle at. My first boggle was Marion stringing a long bow WHILE WALKING DOWN A CORRIDOR! Men had to train for years to be able to string these things, if you couldn't string it, you sure couldn't draw it. I love you Cate, and you were spectacular in it, but no no no no no.
John was twenty years OLDER than Isabella. But the timeline was pretty good, otherwise.
Richard's death—all wrong. He didn't die on the way back from a Crusade, pillaging a few castles on the way. He was shot by a lucky archer though, but not during battle. And he died IN THE ARMS OF HIS MOTHER. What always annoys me is the films always show Richard and LURVING England and wanting to get back to it. He HATED the place, and he spent almost no time there. Aquitaine was his heaven.
But the invasion? The CLIFFS OF DUNGENESS? I think the director had had some kind of mental brainstorm by that time.
And the horses which only go at one speed. Cantering everywhere.
And horses that used the Famous Kevin Costner Shortcut from Prince of Thieves – because they could canter from Nottingham to Dungeness (Kent, on the south coast) in 2 days – OVER A HUNDRED MILES A DAY. no. Just NO.
There's a massive list of other stuff here.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0955308/goofs
Hollywood pap. What a blooming shame because many of the performances (let's gloss over the "everyone is Irish and Robin Hood can't keep the same accent for two seconds altogether)were stellar