I look at some of the report of the Romantic Times bash and I wonder whether, if I ever have to attend, what I'd make of it. I'm not good with large groups of women, and things like the Chippendales leave me cold - went to a performance once and was baffled by the hundreds of baying women, baying over men who wern't even naked. The dressing up, too... *hair stands on end* That's just scary!!
I was pleased to see Linden Bay Romance's report on the convention because it seemed to me they did nothing but work, network and promote - rather than getting their pictures taken with half naked men. I'd enjoy meeting other authors I knew, and booksigning-but the rest scares me rigid.
I'm just too damned English, perhaps. I'd be the one in the corner. Clutching a couple of my books.
May I say, it's VERY scary to go and update one's Wiki pages, only to find that SOMEONE HAS ALREADY DONE IT... *eep*
Page Summary
ejab62.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sleveen.livejournal.com - (no subject)
clarelondon.livejournal.com - (no subject)
aunty_marion - (no subject)
cbpotts.livejournal.com - (no subject)
zamaxfield.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lee-rowan.livejournal.com - (no subject)
haydenthorne.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 11:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 12:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 11:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 12:35 pm (UTC)We'll have to get a group together if we go, people who just want to lurk in the corner.
:)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 12:44 pm (UTC)But it's definitely got better with time! I just have to work out when to hide and when to join in. There are times, of course, when you can be more hidden in a crowd than on your own. /pontificates
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 12:49 pm (UTC)"cat ears"
*sporfles*
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 02:24 pm (UTC)It's obviously just that strange old British inhibition that holds me back...
*coughcough*
^_~
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 01:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 01:23 pm (UTC)The best thing about hotel stays is.. the BREAKFASTS!!!
:)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 01:22 pm (UTC)Not that I'm a big one for sweeping generalizations, but yes, that's it. A lot of the con scene in general seems specifically designed to make Brits uncomfortable. It's just too-too, if that makes sense.
(This being said by the ghost writer who has several Brits on her client list, and having traveled to events with said Brits.)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 01:26 pm (UTC)However, if I ever go to one of these events... I might enjoy it. I don't know. But if it is ANYTHING like the Chippendales thingy I went to, I won't.
What I have found
Date: 2008-04-22 01:29 pm (UTC)Forgive the Random Capitalization, I am channeling the worst of Winnie the Pooh via Dorothy Parker.
(constant weader thwowed up)
Re: What I have found
Date: 2008-04-22 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 01:36 pm (UTC)I like watching the festivities, mostly, but I like to watch from a fair distance and heaven forbid I find myself on YouTube doing it.
Cat ears? What's wrong with cat ears? Oh, not on cats, I see...
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 01:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 01:36 pm (UTC)From reading folks' reports of the big cons, I get the impression that they're mostly business, but the social aspect more flamboyant than you'd get at any random business conference--but then, I've been going to sci-fi and media cons all my adult life so the costume aspect isn't as eyebrow-raising. A Star Trek parody skit with all cast members cross-dressing, with a drag Christine Chapel towering over all the other participants, kind of raises the bar on WTF fancy-dress. But sci-fi isn't generally as big on hearts and flowers... I saw a male strip act once--it was not all that appealing, and I had to wonder how many of the other women were acting as they thought they were expected to act, and how much of the squee could be put down to alcohol or making the boys feel appreciated. I can appreciate a pretty man (or woman) and nude art can be superb, but the objectification turns me off. IMO, romance is about intimacy, not just getting off.
Ever read "Die for Love" by Elizabeth Peters? It's a mystery based around a romance convention, with the heroine, Jacqueline Kirby, very cynically deciding to write a romance novel so she can write a trip to NY off on her taxes. I strongly suspect a couple of the less likeable characters are based on RL people but Peters is clever enough not to leave herself open for a lawsuit. Kirby's a hoot--a female character who has casual liaisons, says what she thinks, and is smart enough to pull it off.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 01:55 pm (UTC)Or at last, they don't in England, perhaps they do at E3 or GenCon!
I'd prefer to go for business, promotion and book signing, rather than the balls. I mean, how many men would there be at these things? Or straight men, anyway.
Firm nod about the objectification.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 01:54 pm (UTC)I've recently read a RT con report at my publisher's mailing list, and like you said, it's all work and a lot of talking and advertising. The key to getting over your discomfort is to go with a group, like Lee Rowan says, or better yet, your publisher. They can at least dole out the logistics, and you answer questions from fans about your books. :)
I'm not too fond of conventions, myself, and see them as a necessary evil. Alas. Then again, I've always been a curmudgeonly hermit.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 01:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 01:57 pm (UTC)