navel gazing
Sep. 26th, 2008 11:13 amKurt Vonnegut - Eight rules for writing fiction:
1. Use the time of a total stranger in such a way that he or she will not feel the time was wasted.
2. Give the reader at least one character he or she can root for.
3. Every character should want something, even if it is only a glass of water.
4. Every sentence must do one of two things -- reveal character or advance the action.
5. Start as close to the end as possible.
6. Be a sadist. Now matter how sweet and innocent your leading characters, make awful things happen to them -- in order that the reader may see what they are made of.
7. Write to please just one person. If you open a window and make love to the world, so to speak, your story will get pneumonia.
8. Give your readers as much information as possible as soon as possible. To heck with suspense. Readers should have such complete understanding of what is going on, where and why, that they could finish the story themselves, should cockroaches eat the last few pages.
This link (found on
heart_set_afire's LJ) really helped me this morning. I've been wallowing in something akin to self pity for the last month or so. Reason being I sent the first page of my new book to a couple of friends - simply because I was pleased that I'd written it - and neither of them liked it. Then yesterday I sent chapter 1 of Junction X to a brand new critique group attached to The Macaronis and had a few hard truths there too.
I don't find critiquing easy - I'm a LOT better than I used to be, before I came out into professional land, but I still find it hard to take. What I need to realise is that it's hard for readers to "get" a character on one chapter and they aren't going to like someone if he's behaving like an arse and they can't see the reason for it. However, there is the fear that if I then give them more than one chapter they might continue to hate him. But - as Kurt says, you've got to have one character for the readers to root for, and I think they'll warm to Edward once Alex comes on the scene.
But I think that critiquing is vital even if it hurts me; it makes me think hard about what I've done and how I can make it better. I'm definitely going to take the prologue out, and shove it out to more agents today. I was rejected twice yesterday which is probably some kind of record.
I particularly like "rule" 5. I was having real problems with starting the new novel, and the more I fiddled with the start, the further BACK in time it went - my first instinct was to start it with the Keepers (of the lighthouse) in a boat setting out for the light - but then I wavered and back in time I went, not once but four times... Now I've decided to ditch it and stuff them back in the little boat.
Number seven is also pertinent. Critique is valuable, but you have to, at some point, believe in your own work. You can't please everyone. I have seen writers changing their stories after every critique session, after every agent's comments. If you do that and continue to do that - in the end the story won't be the story you set out to write.
I needed this kick in the arse today. Kurt - thank you, sir. I'm going to print these out in big letters and put them over my desk next to Heinlein's rules for a human being.
I don't often have such terrible self doubts, so please allow me this wibble of confidence.
I have new babies. Don't let them die.

ETA: "Psmith in the City" is on the radio. I may have died and gone to heaven.
1. Use the time of a total stranger in such a way that he or she will not feel the time was wasted.
2. Give the reader at least one character he or she can root for.
3. Every character should want something, even if it is only a glass of water.
4. Every sentence must do one of two things -- reveal character or advance the action.
5. Start as close to the end as possible.
6. Be a sadist. Now matter how sweet and innocent your leading characters, make awful things happen to them -- in order that the reader may see what they are made of.
7. Write to please just one person. If you open a window and make love to the world, so to speak, your story will get pneumonia.
8. Give your readers as much information as possible as soon as possible. To heck with suspense. Readers should have such complete understanding of what is going on, where and why, that they could finish the story themselves, should cockroaches eat the last few pages.
This link (found on
I don't find critiquing easy - I'm a LOT better than I used to be, before I came out into professional land, but I still find it hard to take. What I need to realise is that it's hard for readers to "get" a character on one chapter and they aren't going to like someone if he's behaving like an arse and they can't see the reason for it. However, there is the fear that if I then give them more than one chapter they might continue to hate him. But - as Kurt says, you've got to have one character for the readers to root for, and I think they'll warm to Edward once Alex comes on the scene.
But I think that critiquing is vital even if it hurts me; it makes me think hard about what I've done and how I can make it better. I'm definitely going to take the prologue out, and shove it out to more agents today. I was rejected twice yesterday which is probably some kind of record.
I particularly like "rule" 5. I was having real problems with starting the new novel, and the more I fiddled with the start, the further BACK in time it went - my first instinct was to start it with the Keepers (of the lighthouse) in a boat setting out for the light - but then I wavered and back in time I went, not once but four times... Now I've decided to ditch it and stuff them back in the little boat.
Number seven is also pertinent. Critique is valuable, but you have to, at some point, believe in your own work. You can't please everyone. I have seen writers changing their stories after every critique session, after every agent's comments. If you do that and continue to do that - in the end the story won't be the story you set out to write.
I needed this kick in the arse today. Kurt - thank you, sir. I'm going to print these out in big letters and put them over my desk next to Heinlein's rules for a human being.
I don't often have such terrible self doubts, so please allow me this wibble of confidence.
I have new babies. Don't let them die.

ETA: "Psmith in the City" is on the radio. I may have died and gone to heaven.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 10:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 10:34 am (UTC)Thank you for sharing the rules. I especially like 3, 4 and 7.
Good luck, happiness and success with your writing!
*rushes out*
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 10:39 am (UTC)I think I need to repost this. :-)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 10:46 am (UTC)And Kurt Vonnegut rules are awesome. And I agree with #8. I just like to TELL IT ALL. I also like Jack Kerouac's.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 10:54 am (UTC)I don't know if I like number eight, so much - because for this book I can't tell it all in one lump, as it's got a mystery element about it. If I did that, it would more like Columbo!
:)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 10:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 10:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 10:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 10:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 11:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 11:45 am (UTC)For me writing is totally a process of discovery. I dont always know whats going to happen when I sit down to work, but I do have a general idea. Sometimes, I have no clue at all, and I sit back and leave it alone because I cant think clearly, or else the environment I am in is simply too poisonous or unstable for me to work in.
On a good day, I am pleased because I know I have chipped away at something immense inside me, which I am delighted to be rid of from my mind at long last
I like these rules, but I also like to listen to my owm instincts about writing. I am not just a blind fan and worshipper of good fiction, but a student participator of the craft. and for the ideas in my head, this takes great patience and discipline. Those are good two, you know...
F i n n e g a n
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 12:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 12:32 pm (UTC)I like the rules you posted. Might have to print them out too. (and or steal them for my blog hehe)
Will go look at the group now.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 02:46 pm (UTC)What is the dragon-egg thing about?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 02:59 pm (UTC)I've seen people do it though, try to please everyone who has a crit about their book and they'll change it to up the pace, and then the next agent will say it's too pacy!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 02:59 pm (UTC):)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 03:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 03:57 pm (UTC)F i n n e g a n
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 04:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 06:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 07:06 pm (UTC)Mark
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 08:52 pm (UTC)Can I have a look at the new book? I must say, I love the way you come up with some really unusual settings and times. Lighthouse keepers? Now you've mentioned it, it's really romantic, but it would never have occurred to me.
(PS, I think we expect the world from you, but only because we know you're capable of it.)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 08:58 pm (UTC):)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 09:18 pm (UTC)I was inspired about Lighthouses when we were driving around a few weeks ago and saw the Happisburgh lighthouse on the horizon - and I thought.. mmmm. "Three men... I think, if they were to have 8 hours shift each... in a lighthouse.. it would have to be out on a rock lighthouse so they could be cut off, and it would need to be before electricity for the same reasons.
BUT OMG. The research! I thought it would be easy! WRONG!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 09:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 09:23 pm (UTC):(
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 09:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 09:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-27 07:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-27 08:40 am (UTC)If Alex hadn't have come along, Edward would probably have remained married but his inclinations may have come out in another way, perhaps become a connoisseur of art of Tuke, perhaps.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-27 09:40 am (UTC)But I carried on, even though it was rubbish, and gradually the characters started to come alive and I started to enjoy myself again. And suddenly the writing didn't look too bad either. I think it's just the pre-flight jitters.
On the other hand, I hear you about the research!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-27 09:50 am (UTC)*g* And I've got to finish two other things before I can think of starting another big book, so you're way ahead of me there.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-28 01:26 am (UTC)It's brave to write a character that way. Some readers will stick with to find out what makes him tick, some won't.
I've gotten more than two rejections in one day, so I really empathize. Cake was the only answer. :hug: