Non dizzy!
Dec. 16th, 2008 10:06 pmToday is the first time I've not had vertigo for just over four weeks. Phew. That was really unpleasant and I really never want that again. It was just bliss to walk to the car without hanging on to the wall.
I've bought myself a new universal remote control as my Satellite control simply never turned up (Lucius probably ate it) and it's rather swish - touch screen! I love gadgets. It's just as well I have very little money or I'd bankrupt myself with STUFF that blinks and beeps.
I sent a shed load of troops (ok, 14) to recapture my six boys who'd been captured. But the bastard captured THEM too. *growls* I'm an extremely bad loser, and if I can't win, I really don't want to play. I would like - overnight Santa if you are listening - 200 cavalry and about 40 catapults so I can go and bash that bastard to smithereens and GET MY BOYS BACK!!! God knows what horrors those Teutons are perpetrating on them. And the insult to injury is that I'm having to pay for their keep! He's not even feeding them! Ok. returning to sanity...
People who write in other genres - are writers as bitchy in your genres as they are in mine? Does Stephen King get really snotty with George R R M? Does Terry Pratchett bitch all over Jim Butcher? (I put wank rather than bitch and then changed it hurriedly, that's not a vision I want in my head, thank you!)
The amount of nastiness, bitchiness and downright BILE I've seen in the last few days - (well, to be honest, ever since I've been writing, really, it just seems to have been worse in the last week or so) is so discouraging. Readers and writers who seem completely incapable of holding a discussion about anything. When I was at school, one of the "arts" we were taught was debate. (No doubt our school was under the impression that we gels were destined for the House of Commons) In debate you have to do that, argue against your opponent's point of view and the major rules were that you were never to lose your temper or make any personal attack at your opponent. I've said before that when I came out of fandom I was like some fluffy bunny, sniffing in the sunlight thinking that mixing with professional writers online would be like some techno-Bloomsbury Set or the Inklings. We'd debate the merit of the written word, puff on imaginary pipes and wear virtual tweed with elbow patches.
How naive I was.
Oh - and don't forget the Advent Calendar - it's still going!
I've bought myself a new universal remote control as my Satellite control simply never turned up (Lucius probably ate it) and it's rather swish - touch screen! I love gadgets. It's just as well I have very little money or I'd bankrupt myself with STUFF that blinks and beeps.
I sent a shed load of troops (ok, 14) to recapture my six boys who'd been captured. But the bastard captured THEM too. *growls* I'm an extremely bad loser, and if I can't win, I really don't want to play. I would like - overnight Santa if you are listening - 200 cavalry and about 40 catapults so I can go and bash that bastard to smithereens and GET MY BOYS BACK!!! God knows what horrors those Teutons are perpetrating on them. And the insult to injury is that I'm having to pay for their keep! He's not even feeding them! Ok. returning to sanity...
People who write in other genres - are writers as bitchy in your genres as they are in mine? Does Stephen King get really snotty with George R R M? Does Terry Pratchett bitch all over Jim Butcher? (I put wank rather than bitch and then changed it hurriedly, that's not a vision I want in my head, thank you!)
The amount of nastiness, bitchiness and downright BILE I've seen in the last few days - (well, to be honest, ever since I've been writing, really, it just seems to have been worse in the last week or so) is so discouraging. Readers and writers who seem completely incapable of holding a discussion about anything. When I was at school, one of the "arts" we were taught was debate. (No doubt our school was under the impression that we gels were destined for the House of Commons) In debate you have to do that, argue against your opponent's point of view and the major rules were that you were never to lose your temper or make any personal attack at your opponent. I've said before that when I came out of fandom I was like some fluffy bunny, sniffing in the sunlight thinking that mixing with professional writers online would be like some techno-Bloomsbury Set or the Inklings. We'd debate the merit of the written word, puff on imaginary pipes and wear virtual tweed with elbow patches.
How naive I was.
Oh - and don't forget the Advent Calendar - it's still going!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-16 10:33 pm (UTC)The fandom apple doesn't fall far from the tree. :)
I can say that most of what happens in GloBL tends to stay in emails or at conventions.
I bring you this though, it tends to work in my genre:
http://gynocrat.org/butthurt.jpg
no subject
Date: 2008-12-16 10:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-16 10:36 pm (UTC)I have never seen authors in other genres behave they do in Romanceland. I've set a firm "No blogs" rule for myself (with 2 exceptions) because I have enough problems in my life without looking for more negativity.
Um....speaking of blogs, I owe you one, don't I?
no subject
Date: 2008-12-16 10:55 pm (UTC)Do you? Well get busy then!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-16 11:25 pm (UTC)Slightly off topic, but sort of in the vein of authors bitching about authors, I got the new Deric Longden (Thermal and Tigger are still alive and well and talking to him) and I squee'd when he mentioned Pterry! I won't spoil it for you, you can head to the library and get the book, but it made me laugh out loud in the tearoom, and for once I wasn't in there on my own. Can you imagine having to explain BOTH those authors before being able to share what made you cry with laughter?
no subject
Date: 2008-12-16 11:44 pm (UTC)I'll have to check that one out! He writes slower than me!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-16 11:36 pm (UTC)I seem to have been extremely lucky in my choice of fandom - I can't recall even one incident of wank. We all seem to be terribly polite and mature.
I'm honestly in two minds about whether I want to get into the the world on original m/m if I'm going to have to deal with that level of crap.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-16 11:44 pm (UTC)It is possible to write and publish without bothering with the blogs and stuff at all - probably best to, in fact.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-16 11:51 pm (UTC)This might mean that I have to marry you.
Thank you! :D
no subject
Date: 2008-12-16 11:52 pm (UTC)I DO!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 12:30 am (UTC)I've met and am still very happy to know a bunch of really neat writers. I've also met (and wish I had not) a handful of diva wannabes who seem to have the fannish attitude that anything shy of worship is a mortal insult. I expect they think I'm as big a jerk as I think they are. Ce'st la vie. But y'know... I can't think of any segment of human interaction that doesn't have this going on. Jobs I've held, school... hell, even churches have their Church Ladies who seem to have narrowed their entire focus into being Teacher's Pet to the pastor. I don't think there's any escaping interpersonal politicking.
We'd probably all get more writing done if we didn't have the lists. I expect the social aspect of all this is useful in promoting books, but being in the 25% of the population that's introverted, I do wonder how extraverts ever get anything written.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 09:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 03:32 am (UTC)I don't know what it is, since I personally prefer to keep my disagreements civil and to attack the idea, not the person when I do disagree.
Had to tell you that the sf story was wowza. Even if you don't like much sf, the story was great!
Um. I have a very sketchy smut scene written, but I have a query for you if I may.... What would a very correct and rather innocent Victorian gentleman call his penis? If he happened to be wanking off and someone joined him, as it were... I have no idea and cock seems wrong to me.
BTW, is gel still a common useage? I used it in the current ms when someone's hearty squire-ish father was talking and people gave me grief about it. I thought it was standard for hearty squire-ish types.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 09:07 am (UTC)I think that it's an American taboo that you feel cock is wrong - see this article
http://encyclopedia.jrank.org/articles/pages/595/Cock.html
membrum virile is possibly too flowery - prick, old man, arousal...
Sland and Euphenemism by Richard A Spears is a great resource.
Here's another great one. Anti-masturbatory devices!
http://www.isis.aust.com/stephan/writings/sexuality/vict.htm
No - gel's not in useage. It just makes me smile and reminds me of my hockey teacher.
:)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 03:51 pm (UTC)Also, more space-bois!!!!! I really liked them.
"gel" isn't in common useage now, but it would be okay in Victorian times, no? (At least for the hearty type?)
I will be attempting to type the scene in tonight/today, and I will send you a copy, if you don't mind. I really need some reassurance that I'm not totally writing tripe! (And my writer's group is not into m/m.)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 05:15 pm (UTC)And no probs, i'd like to read it!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 07:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 08:55 am (UTC)As I said. There are ways to discuss and debate. One can offer one's opposing opinion without resorting to "you suck!" - and once you've gone done that route, you've already lost the argument. Perhaps it's an English thing.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 09:18 am (UTC)Smart Bitches. My ass. HAH. That is ridiculous. As for the chat group - I would suggest that Samhain need to get a hell of a lot more professional and control their groups if they want to keep authors like yourself.
*is indignant on your behalf*
So, I'm about 6000 words into new story. *grin* Vashtan showed me this thing called Etsy - because I'm typing in real time online and cannot format things, it means that I pulled 1800 words out of my arse in 45 mins. Not bad. And they were useful plot driving words too!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 09:21 am (UTC):)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 09:27 am (UTC)This makes me happy. If you want context I can send you the rest - but be warned, it is seriously rough. Day before yest I realised that I had forgotten to give characters physical features and had to go back and insert features. Most amusing. Remember Looshie and how everyone knew he had lovely long blond hair? *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 11:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 12:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 12:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 12:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 12:36 pm (UTC)*hides*
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 12:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 08:44 am (UTC)As for bitchery you should hear archaeologists slagging each other off, or curators criticising each others professional practices. Emotionally charged professions are even worse. People, sadly, are people and a level of malicious silliness seems to be in the genes.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 08:51 am (UTC)Ooooo - bitching archaeologists!!!! How inspiring! Indiana Jones/Giles hate sex! With Tweed!
*ponders*
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 09:04 am (UTC)Real archaeologists are such fun - beardy and beery and irreverent and capable of obsessive delicacy teasing pieces of broken bronze out of the mud with a 000 brush. One wonders if they might apply such devotion to their relationships? Ah well, too late to find out now.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 09:10 am (UTC)ARGH! FIGHTS THE BUNNIES OFF.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 02:56 pm (UTC)*has vast crush on Giles*
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 05:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 08:39 pm (UTC)Someone needs to write this.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-18 12:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 07:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 09:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-18 12:21 am (UTC)I could've absolutely understood an expression of disappointment. But the three or four of them were snarking and dissing the Harry Potter books, like they were complete crap and trash compared with Diskworld. I'll admit I like Diskworld better, as literature, but Pratchett's nasty and IMO unprofessional attitude in public before an audience turned me off.
Sounds like exactly the same "My books are great and your books suck" kind of attitude you're talking about. :/
Angie
no subject
Date: 2008-12-18 09:07 am (UTC)I don't think i've ever seen "your books suck" on the forums I've been talking about, but it's usually on a discussion about something else, and suddenly things turn nasty - it's simply like people don't know how to take up an opposing opinion and expressing it without getting vicious.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-18 09:43 am (UTC)So he makes a habit of it, then? That's unfortunate. [sigh] It makes him sound peevishly jealous or resentful of her popularity. And what the heck does he have to resent? He's got a stack of bestsellers as tall as he is -- that sort of behavior just makes him look bad. I still love his work, but after seeing him at that convention I have very little respect for the man, which is sad. :(
I don't think I've ever seen anyone come out and say "your books suck" either, but when people get superior and condescending, whether it's author to author or publisher to publisher, that really seems to be the heart of it. If the snarker didn't think she/he was better, what grounds would she have for snarking?
Angie
no subject
Date: 2008-12-18 12:49 am (UTC)As for the rest... I've already told you in private how I felt, but it still astounds me (then again, maybe not) how utterly negative people can be, especially in this genre. I've all but dropped out of groups after the storm I endured, and it nearly destroyed me. But you know what? I'm still here. So are you, and all the others who've had to endure it. Just proves how strong such things can make you. I only hope future victims can weather it as well.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-18 09:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-18 06:48 pm (UTC)