Article about m/m in the Globe and Mail

[erastes]

This article was going to go out in December, but then they decided to run it near Valentine's Day, which is quite sweet.  There are a few inaccuracies in it, I have to say: I'm NOT 47, although I wish I was, I'm a few years older—and I haven't been married to a man for 15 years. God knows where they got that from. For the record, not that it's really anyone's business, I was married for a year in 1988, and that was only because I had to wait a year before I could start divorce proceedings—he'd been unfaithful around six months so I chucked him out!

Anyway—it's not a bad article, despite the usual slanted nonsense and inaccuracies. The comments are rather amusing though. They range from WHAT WOULD JESUS THINK? to YUK to HURRAH!.

Alex Beecroft and Heidi Cullinan and I are quoted.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/valentines-day/what-women-want-gay-male-romance-novels/article1902774/

Comments

[lee-rowan.livejournal.com]

I have to chuckle at the "Well, I'M a woman and I don't like it, so you're wrong-wrong-wrong!" letters. For a fairly conservative paper, you got reasonably polite coverage. I have to wonder how many of the 'indignant' readers are going to be googling for m/m in the next few days.

[erastes.livejournal.com]

Of course it was polite - it's Canadian, hey!