Finished my "nasty character" piece
Jul. 17th, 2006 04:50 pmAnd guess what? It's NOT slashy!!! (well, ok, it does have my executioner looking at the doomed king in interest and the doomed king DOES touch the executioner, (on the cheek.. his FACE CHEEK)....but that's it. No frantic shaggage in a dungeon.)
It's gen! *feels pulse to see if I'm all right*
Now I need to make it readable. it's a bit bitty
Am pleased. Where are all the gay erotica submission calls? Even Nightcharm has closed down for fiction submissions, which is not fair.
It's NINETY degrees in this OFFICE by the way. Just sayin'
I'm doing a list of descriptive text that is used in gay porn, I'd promised both
rwday and
theregoesyamum that I'd do it ages ago, and never got around to it, so watch out for that later this evening.
Let me just say that "engorged fuck-tube" is one of the nicer terms. There are so many "how to write gay porn" articles floating about here and there that I'm tempted one of these days to write "and how not to, please, really. I mean it" to make a balance. I know that a lot of the anthologies are wank books but things like "pulsing jism" really doesn't do it for me. Just looked up "jism" on etymology online - evidently it was coined in 1899. Well that's that. I'm never writing anything based earlier than 1899.
*retreats further into the past*
*presses send and hopes the formatting works coz if not I can't fix it for an hour*
It's gen! *feels pulse to see if I'm all right*
Now I need to make it readable. it's a bit bitty
Am pleased. Where are all the gay erotica submission calls? Even Nightcharm has closed down for fiction submissions, which is not fair.
It's NINETY degrees in this OFFICE by the way. Just sayin'
I'm doing a list of descriptive text that is used in gay porn, I'd promised both
Let me just say that "engorged fuck-tube" is one of the nicer terms. There are so many "how to write gay porn" articles floating about here and there that I'm tempted one of these days to write "and how not to, please, really. I mean it" to make a balance. I know that a lot of the anthologies are wank books but things like "pulsing jism" really doesn't do it for me. Just looked up "jism" on etymology online - evidently it was coined in 1899. Well that's that. I'm never writing anything based earlier than 1899.
*retreats further into the past*
*presses send and hopes the formatting works coz if not I can't fix it for an hour*
no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 07:28 pm (UTC)And YAY for gen! *faints* It sounds fabulous. That reminds me in a bizarre roundabout way, I watched Dr. Who with commentary by Russell T. Davies the other day on BBC3 (why do I discover you can do this at the END of the series?)and when the doctor kissed muppet Mickey on the head, he laughed and said somehing like he HAD to get a male on male kiss in there somewhere - I think he mentioned something about episode 13 being significant but I couldn't hear it properly. See, he IS hiding slashy undertones, and it's only the evil BBC who are reigning him in. We just have to look harder.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 08:46 pm (UTC)Hell I tell you! It'll be like "Ice cold in Alex" but without the ice cold Carlsberg. Pushing trucks up sand dunes.
OMG now I want an icecold beer.
I'm hoping torchwood (THAT'S TORCHWOOD DEAR, don't miss it) will be slashier. It's after the watershed and aimed at adults.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 09:04 pm (UTC)http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/news/cult/news/drwho/2005/10/17/25634.shtml
You should watch the Dr Who Confidentials!
no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 09:08 pm (UTC)